
|
For
many organizations, statement-of-work
(SOW)-based spend is an area lacking true
clarity and process consistency across the
enterprise. Formal structure and centralized
control increase operational efficiencies,
lower compliance risk, and most notably,
drive significant cost savings; however, the
idea of bringing this area of spend under
strategic management can seem daunting.
Through Corporate United’s partnership with
TAPFIN Process Solutions, member companies
now have access to an industry-leading
Services Procurement Management (SPM)
solution to meet these specific needs
related to SOW-based spend.
TAPFIN’s SPM solution
implements best practices and smart business
rules derived from client experience and
industry thought leadership to deliver
automation and improved processes for how a
company procures and manages outsourced
services. This approach results almost
immediately in increased visibility that
enables spend optimization and tighter
controls. In turn, this visibility leads to
valuable hard- and soft-dollar savings,
largely through cost avoidance and demand
management. The more specific benefits will
vary based on an organization’s current
procurement processes and capabilities.
Less mature organizations
will find significant opportunities in
bringing simple structure to what is often
an unruly process. More mature organizations
will find significant improvement and
savings opportunities by optimizing their
process and taking full advantage of
technology and business intelligence as key
components of their project procurement
process. Inefficient processes can
drastically slow down productivity, place an
inordinate burden on company employees and
vendors and can even result in selecting the
"wrong" vendor – all of which create
unnecessary costs and cause missed business
objectives and timelines. Improving these
processes and automating the workflow can
dramatically enhance the entire procedure.
In addition, SPM provides a vehicle for
ensuring compliance with company and
regulatory policies and best practices.
Benefits of Utilizing a
Managed Service Provider (MSP)
SPM fits ideally within a Managed Service
Provider (MSP) program, as the consultative
nature of an experienced MSP can add great
value through lessons learned, industry best
practices and awareness of market trends.
Partnering with an MSP allows a company’s
procurement organization to focus on more
critical tasks and core competencies. The
MSP is accountable for creating and managing
the full SPM lifecycle – the vendors are
engaged and managed, delivery and milestones
are tracked and vendor performance completes
the cycle (reference the Full SPM Workflow
sidebar below).
Defining the right balance
of responsibilities that the client retains
versus those delegated to the MSP can
optimize the effectiveness of company
resources and the SPM solution. Within the
framework of the overall procurement
lifecycle, TAPFIN typically recommends the
following:
The MSP provides subject matter
expertise in the creation and evaluation
portions of the RFx process. The MSP
also provides the vendor profiles and
performance data needed to make informed
decisions for vendor selection,
understanding that companies know their
vendors best and can do the best job of
selecting who should receive an RFx and
be awarded the business.
Vendor Relationship:
The MSP assists in vendor interactions
and acts as the client’s agent in
discussions and negotiations. This
allows the client to focus on growing
and maintaining a productive
relationship with the vendors that are
critical to the organization.
Invoicing and
Payment:
The MSP takes on the administrative
burden of the process so client
resources can focus on ensuring the work
quality and appropriateness. The client
approves all invoices once work is
satisfactorily completed, while the MSP
takes care of payment. This is the least
risky approach and ensures the highest
quality of vendor deliverables.
Vendor Performance
Management:
The MSP collects and provides the
information and reporting needed to make
an informed vendor decision, including
key data around delivery, performance
and market trends. The MSP also analyzes
vendor performance and makes
recommendations to ensure continuous
process improvements in subsequent
vendor selection efforts.
Organizations Best Suited
for SPM
The best candidates for SPM are those
companies with a significant amount of
SOW-based activity and little or no
visibility into their procurement lifecycle.
Organizations that have deployed vendor
management services have already benefited
from the value provided by this sort of
program and are likely to recognize the
benefits that SPM can provide. Organizations
with a centralized procurement function will
have an easier time implementing SPM than
those organizations that have scattered
procurement processes. Either type of
organization can succeed, but there is
significantly more work in store for one
that has not yet centralized procurement.
Next Steps
Once the decision has been made to proceed
with an SPM program, the next step for any
company is to develop an appropriate
implementation plan. This plan should
identify the process improvements to be
made, roll-out activities (communication,
training, support, tool launch) and support
to be provided (help desk, job aids,
training materials). While some
organizations elect to roll out an entirely
new process in a "big bang" mode, many
organizations choose a phased-in approach,
initially identifying areas that deliver the
greatest impact to the existing process.
Steps to take to develop
an SPM implementationplan include:
-
Identify current
process, core competencies, strengths
and pain points
-
Identify necessary
and/or desired improvements
-
Consider implementing in
phases, selecting the phase most likely
to succeed and/or deliver the highest
ROI
-
If possible, tap into
the expertise of an experienced MSP to
gain a better understanding of technical
pitfalls and lessons learned
SPM Readiness Assessment
To learn more about potential benefits and
savings based on specific company needs,
TAPFIN invites Corporate United member
companies to receive its SPM Readiness
Assessment (www.tapfin.com/invitations/spm/index.html).
By taking 15 minutes to answer some basic
questions about SOW-based spending,
companies are equipped with a clear picture
of how the solution can work for them and
what level of ROI they could expect for
implementing an SPM program. In particular,
the Readiness Assessment focuses on the
impact of the program on the key areas of
compliance, risk management, process
efficiency and, of course, cost savings.
For more information on TAPFIN and SPM,
please contact your member development
representative at 440.895.0938.
|
Full SPM
Workflow – RFx to Check
Sourcing Decision
Enforce business rules to
determine how the engagement is
to be managed (VMS, SPM, other)
1. Develop
RFx/Solicit Bids
-
Develop RFx
-
Establish
evaluation committee (as
applicable)
-
Electronic
approval
-
Distribute
RFx to approved and
niche/minority vendors as
required
-
Develop
scorecard for ranking
2. Vendor
Submittals
-
Post RFx to
vendors
-
Vendors
develop RFx response
-
Vendors
submit through system
-
Client/TAPFIN
receive responses
3. Evaluate &
Award
-
RFx
distributed to evaluation
team
-
Evaluation
team evaluates and scores
-
Final
rankings displayed
-
Client makes
final selection and extends
award offer
-
Vendor
rankings
4.
Contracting Work Order
-
Capture key
commitments and deliverables
-
Include
terms and conditions into
SOW/SLA contract documents
-
Obtain PO
through client system
-
Services
contracted
-
On-board
resources
5.
Invoicing/Payment
-
Vendor
requests payment for
completed work
-
Validate
delivery against SOW/SLAs
-
Invoice
approved by client
-
Payment made
to TAPFIN
-
TAPFIN pays
vendor
6.
Performance Management
-
Achievements
against key deliverables and
milestones tracked
-
Achievement
against SLAs tracked
-
Evaluations
of vendor performance
gathered
-
Vendor
performance recorded
- Add/remove vendors to
optimize vendor pool
|
|
|
|